The benefits of ‘protecting the children:law enfarcement, bullying, and family secrets

When I first arrived in Mamasota, I was unknowingly engulfed in a moral panic. And the effects of that echo today in the form of one of the most perverse mechanisms of social control I could ever imagine: moral panics that use children as both objects of conquest (babies in Iraq and generations of children who will suffer the effects of depleted uranium that was dropped on them) and as objects of protection ( and here. and here, and here-always in Mamasota the blonde child or blonde female in general is at once an “object” of protection, and then, again, a money making tool –every child that is kidnapped by state agencies, and pimped into the social mechanism of foster care is worth HUNDREDS of thousands from the federal government.

And, this is MKULTRA by design–a social mechanism that deviates from “protecting children” to one the kidnaps, and indoctrinates them, according to prevailing government propaganda campaigns)

“It’s for the children,” they always say, as they march off to kill other children’s children–while keeping their own federally subsidized, propagandized, and safely FAR AWAY from any other non-state paid opinions of “well being.” The state unfortunately, IS well being–and that is the exact problem that children face: once upon a time, the American government PIMPED children–whereas now, they theoretically pimp them selves–but ONLY after  men have been removed from their households–children that act as de facto missiles of state indoctrination, sans male opinion–sans a fathers opinion; sans the opinion of the person who is statistically the LEAST likely to ever hurt, maim, or kill a child-the natural father of a child has been demonized, scrutinized, and set up as a bogeyman, despite ALL evidence to the contrary of what persons might HURT a child,

Or: our children have been kidnapped at a state level.

This map shows the incorporated and unincorpor...

This map shows the incorporated and unincorporated areas in Scott County, Minnesota, highlighting Shakopee in red. It was created with a custom script with US Census Bureau data and modified with Inkscape. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

It is odd to me, this hypocrisy around children.  One group of people from Mamasota itself, marching off to other countries to ‘fight’ pre-emptive wars, and kill other peoples fathers, mothers, and children–and, with new weapons like depleted uranium ( the asbestos of Iraq’s n–they kill them for generations to come.

Meanwhile, state agents, the police, and many, many other associated persons and groups derive income from raising the spectre of all kinds of bogeymen--from the current ‘sexual exploitation’ hysteria, to child abuse and pornography panics--these insidious forms of mind control are indeed the salve that law enfarcers stroke on themselves in order to feel like they are the ‘good guys.’

I was always a believer that when one is attacked, it is sound policy to fight back-but I have never been persuaded that attacking others first is either morally, ethically, or otherwise sound policy, much less the decent thing to do. But through moral and social panic engineering, American society pre-emptively enforces a fearful conformity on its populace by selectively targeting groups or individuals and holding them up against the iron fist of state power; that fist able to break lives and pocket books , and to smash reputations forever.

Americans have not fought a fair war of honorable self defense since WW2–and it amazes me that any person cheer the image of Saddam Hussein dangling from a rope in place of America’s own international war criminals. But then again, most Mamasotans thought that Saddam was that other guy–and that Sadam bombed the twin towers on 9/11.

At first I was stymied as to how a national conscience could be formed in such a way as to condone such pre-emptive wars–how a nation could raise children who believe that such pre-emptive or illegal wars are justifiable. And since coming to Mamasota, I have indeed found every answer I need: they do it by keeping their citizens trapped in superstition, and fearing the authority of authorities–by on one hand preaching freedom, and on the other, cowering to think that they could become the target of state and police state abuse.

So, today, while researching one of the biggest moral panics that Mamasota ever orchestrated, I began a list of people, agencies, and so forth, that derived direct monetary benefits, as well as subsidiary social capital from the orchestration of a child abuse scandal in Mamasota:

The Jordan Minnesota Sex ring scandal, and its beneficiaries:

SCOTT COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Minnesota; R. Kathleen Morris, individually and in her official capacity as attorney for Scott County; Scott County Board of Commissioners; Scott County Welfare Department and Margaret Subby, it’s Director of Human Services; Scott County Sheriff’s Department and it’s Deputies, Patrick Morgan and Michael Bush; Doris Wilker, Social Worker, Scott County Welfare Department; Joel Kaufmann, psychologist, Scott County Welfare Department; Jane McNaught, and Center for Child and Family Therapy; B.A. Bershow, M.D., and Burnsville Family Physicians, P.A.; John Doe and Mary Doe and other employees of Scott County whose names and titles are unknown, Defendants.
Robert BENTZ and Lois Bentz, individually and as parents and natural guardians of Marlin Bentz, William Bentz and Anthony Bentz, minors, Plaintiffs,
v.
SCOTT COUNTY; R. Kathleen Morris, Scott County Attorney; Margaret Subby, Scott County Welfare Department/Director of Human Services; Doris Wilker, Social Worker, Scott County Welfare Department; Paul Thomsen, Guardian Ad Litem; Michael Bush, Patrick Morgan and Norman Pint, Scott County Deputy Sheriffs; Michael Shea, Leslie Faricy, Michael Shea and Associates; Earl Barrett; Cindy Christ; and John Doe and Mary Roe; and other employees of Scott County Human Services whose names and titles are unknown, Defendants.
Thomas and Helen BROWN, individually and as parents and natural guardians of Brandy Brown and Jeff Brown, Plaintiffs,
v.
SCOTT COUNTY and R. Kathleen Morris, Scott County Attorney, Scott County Welfare Department and Peg Subby, its Director of Human Services, Susan Phipps-Yonas and Phipps-Yonas & Price, P.A., John Manahan and Diane K. Johnson, Guardian Ad Litems, Doris Wilker Social Worker, and other Employees of Scott County Human Services whose names and titles are unknown, Defendants.
George B. GOULD, Plaintiff,
v.
COUNTY OF SCOTT, STATE OF MINNESOTA; R. Kathleen Morris, individually, and as Scott County Attorney; City of Jordan, Minnesota, and City of Jordan Police Department; Sheriff of Scott County, State of Minnesota, Defendants.
United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.
October 2, 1985.

*social capital is a term of sociology that means non-monetary compensation, that increases the social ‘value’ of an individual, or an institution. In this case, these people and institutions gained federal funding, state funding, personal compensation in te form of salaries derived, and benefits derived while pursuing this false prosecution.

The social capital, however was that they were able to ‘look good’ at the expense of others who they tried to make ‘look bad’–and there is no recovery for victims of false prosecutions, as the moral stain lives forever, as well as the paper trail, and the slander in official records. Further, the social capital they derived were in the form of job promotions based in this false heroism,good standing amongst peers, voters, and neighbors, etc.

Further beneficiaries:

Guardians Ad Litem:
Diane Johnson and John Manahan in Buchan (CIVIL 3-84-1615) and Brown (CIVIL 3-85-337) Paul Thomsen in Myers (CIVIL 4-84-1066) and Bentz (CIVIL 3-85-336)

Therapists:
Thomas Price and Phipps-Yonas & Price, P.A. in Myers, Lallak (CIVIL 4-84-1230), and Buchan1 Michael Shea and Shea & Associates, P.A. in Buchan and Bentz Center for Child & Family Therapy in Meger (CIVIL 3-85-138) Leslie Faricy in Bentz Susan Phipps-Yonas and Phipps-Yonas & Price, P.A. in Brown

Material below from http://www.a-team.org/scott_county.html
Cops:
During the course of that investigation, over a dozen state and federal investigative agents focused on what happened in Scott County.

State attorneys:
Metropolitan area county attorneys, including Dakota County Attorney, Robert Carolan, Hennepin County Attorney, Thomas Johnson, and Ramsey County Attorney, Tom Foley, also provided assistance by assigning staff attorneys to handle the child neglect and dependency cases arising out of the sex abuse allegations. In addition, eight attorneys and tour criminal investigators from the State Attorney General’s Office participate in this effort

Here are my rough notes with two sources below:

http://www.leagle.com/decision/19852152618FSupp1534_11917

IN RE SCOTT COUNTY MASTER DOCKETNos. Civ. 3-85-774, 4-84-1066, 4-84-1214, 4-84-1230, 3-84-1615, 3-85-138, 3-85-336, 3-85-337 and 3-85-506.

“On September 26, 1983, Chris Brown contacted the City of Jordan Police Department because she feared that James Rud had sexually abused her ten-year-old daughter and her eight-year-old son. Jordan Police arrested Rud that same evening on charges of sexually abusing children. The arrest and questioning of Rud set into motion what became known as the “Jordan sex ring investigation.”

Of all the criminal cases involving the Jordan sex ring, only the Bentz case went to trial.2 In September of 1984, the jury acquitted the Bentzes of all counts. On October 15, 1984, Scott County Attorney R. Kathleen Morris dismissed the charges against the remaining Jordan sex ring defendants. Morris explained the dismissal of these allegations as necessary to avoid prejudicing an investigation of great magnitude, which was a reference to an investigation of alleged homicides in Scott County. Morris also noted that further criminal trials would harm the children who had to appear as witnesses. Subsequently, state and federal authorities assumed control over further investigations and legal proceedings involving alleged Scott County child abusers. These authorities did not reinstate criminal actions against any of the 21 individuals who had their charges dismissed.

The case also demonstrated the nature of several things: the nature of endemic prosecutorial misconduct in Minnesota jurisdictions; the incestuous nature of police and prosecutors as regards ’emotional incest,’ and shared extr-familial status; the way that public policy and socisal hysteria campaigns work in Minesota.

Re: tampering with evidence/destruction of evidence, and the perverse and perverted sense of implanting memories in children.Or–tampering with children.

“Morris ordered the destruction of evidence in the criminal cases and that she personally destroyed evidence herself. Such acts, contend plaintiffs, are not protected by absolute immunity. No dispute exists that detective (and defendant) Norm Pint video taped an interview of the two oldest Myers children on May 22, 1984 at the scene of alleged child sexual abuse, the Quarry Camp Grounds, and that video tape was later erased.”

People and institutions that directly benefitted–financially, and in terms of ‘social capital*’– from this false prosecution:

v.
SCOTT COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Minnesota; R. Kathleen Morris, individually and in her official capacity as attorney for Scott County; Scott County Board of Commissioners; Scott County Welfare Department and Margaret Subby, it’s Director of Human Services; Scott County Sheriff’s Department and it’s Deputies, Patrick Morgan and Michael Bush; Doris Wilker, Social Worker, Scott County Welfare Department; Joel Kaufmann, psychologist, Scott County Welfare Department; Jane McNaught, and Center for Child and Family Therapy; B.A. Bershow, M.D., and Burnsville Family Physicians, P.A.; John Doe and Mary Doe and other employees of Scott County whose names and titles are unknown, Defendants.
Robert BENTZ and Lois Bentz, individually and as parents and natural guardians of Marlin Bentz, William Bentz and Anthony Bentz, minors, Plaintiffs,
v.
SCOTT COUNTY; R. Kathleen Morris, Scott County Attorney; Margaret Subby, Scott County Welfare Department/Director of Human Services; Doris Wilker, Social Worker, Scott County Welfare Department; Paul Thomsen, Guardian Ad Litem; Michael Bush, Patrick Morgan and Norman Pint, Scott County Deputy Sheriffs; Michael Shea, Leslie Faricy, Michael Shea and Associates; Earl Barrett; Cindy Christ; and John Doe and Mary Roe; and other employees of Scott County Human Services whose names and titles are unknown, Defendants.
Thomas and Helen BROWN, individually and as parents and natural guardians of Brandy Brown and Jeff Brown, Plaintiffs,
v.
SCOTT COUNTY and R. Kathleen Morris, Scott County Attorney, Scott County Welfare Department and Peg Subby, its Director of Human Services, Susan Phipps-Yonas and Phipps-Yonas & Price, P.A., John Manahan and Diane K. Johnson, Guardian Ad Litems, Doris Wilker Social Worker, and other Employees of Scott County Human Services whose names and titles are unknown, Defendants.
George B. GOULD, Plaintiff,
v.
COUNTY OF SCOTT, STATE OF MINNESOTA; R. Kathleen Morris, individually, and as Scott County Attorney; City of Jordan, Minnesota, and City of Jordan Police Department; Sheriff of Scott County, State of Minnesota, Defendants.
United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.
October 2, 1985.

*social capital is a term of sociology that means non-monetary compensation, that increases the social ‘value’ of an individual, or an institution. In this case, these people and institutions gained federal funding, state funding, personal compensation in te form of salaries derived, and benefits derived while pursuing this false prosecution.

The social capital, however was that they were able to ‘look good’ at the expense of others who they tried to make ‘look bad’–and there is no recovery for victims of false prosecutions, as the moral stain lives forever, as well as the paper trail, and the slander in official records. Further, the social capital they derived were in the form of job promotions based in this false heroism,good standing amongst peers, voters, and neighbors, etc.

Further beneficiaries:

Guardians Ad Litem:
Diane Johnson and John Manahan in Buchan (CIVIL 3-84-1615) and Brown (CIVIL 3-85-337) Paul Thomsen in Myers (CIVIL 4-84-1066) and Bentz (CIVIL 3-85-336)

Therapists:
Thomas Price and Phipps-Yonas & Price, P.A. in Myers, Lallak (CIVIL 4-84-1230), and Buchan1 Michael Shea and Shea & Associates, P.A. in Buchan and Bentz Center for Child & Family Therapy in Meger (CIVIL 3-85-138) Leslie Faricy in Bentz Susan Phipps-Yonas and Phipps-Yonas & Price, P.A. in Brown

Material below from http://www.a-team.org/scott_county.html
Cops:
During the course of that investigation, over a dozen state and federal investigative agents focused on what happened in Scott County.

State attorneys:
Metropolitan area county attorneys, including Dakota County Attorney, Robert Carolan, Hennepin County Attorney, Thomas Johnson, and Ramsey County Attorney, Tom Foley, also provided assistance by assigning staff attorneys to handle the child neglect and dependency cases arising out of the sex abuse allegations. In addition, eight attorneys and tour criminal investigators from the State Attorney General’s Office participate in this effort.
At the conclusion of their investigation, the FBI/BCA agents submitted their investigative findings to Attorney General Humphrey. Those findings are as follows:

There is no credible evidence to support allegations of murder, which arose during the sexual abuse investigation.

There is insufficient evidence to justify the filing of any new sex abuse charges.

Those findings were unanimously supported by each investigator working on these cases. It should be emphasized that some children in Scott County were sexually abused. One individual has already been convicted as a result of a guilty plea. Other offenders received immunity and are undergoing treatment. In one instance the abuse occurred outside the period of the statute of limitations. In another instance a woman admitted sexually abusing her son, but the Scott County Attorney decided not to file charges. In that case there were no indications of any connection with a sex ring or other adults. With respect to all other allegations of abuse, however, it is impossible to determine whether such abuse actually occurred, and if it did, who may have done these acts. The reasons for this impossibility are set forth in this report.

SPECIAL NOTES:

This is a rough draft.

Keywords: Minncest, Mamasota, Jordan Minnesota, moral panic, law enfarcement, hypocrisy, collusion, police and state, police state

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: