No matter how hard Christians pander to Jews–or how hard Jews now pander to Muslims by claiming that the maiming of little boy children through circumcision–genital mutilation–is “anti-religious’, the subtext says that pro-circumcision Jews are trying to continue to reinforce chattel slavery through such a practice.
AND playing one side against the other.
On one hand, they are claiming that the humane EU policy of forbidding the genital mutilation of male children is “anti-religious’; and thereby appealing to Muslim religious sentiment (that sentiment most recently ‘liberated’ and ‘given voice”.
On the other, they usd to claim such prohibitions were “anti-semitic’ meaning that the Zionist patriarchy amongst them felt that such humane policy was directed at Jews specifically–yet Jewish Hollywood, and the Jewish owned American press certainly gets its undies in a bundle when womens labia are chopped off–and directs (projects) all kinds of motive into that practice.
Or, put another way ” you can’t have your callimari, and eat it too” Or something like that.