Cassandra Feuerstein’s face was all but demolished when a brutal American cop named Michael Hart threw her face first into a concrete slab. What a senaky bastard he must be in real life. And what a cowardly farce he is. I hope someone shoots him in the face*.
Mrs. Feurerstein is triply cursed: she weighs in at only 110 pounds, which makes her an ideal target for police brutality because many American cops are HUGE–or merely grossly overweight, often times tipping the scales at 350 lbs. or more. And they often have thick heads, and jowls as well.
And she was also unlikely aware that American law enfarcers are studying the use, and the manipulation of cameras–they are actively at war with cameras and how to manipulate the view of their own actions and the actions of others on film. And, if you watch the video, you will see exactly this: at 21 seconds, the camera switches from angle 1, which is public space, to angle 2 which is jail cell–and it is EXACTLY at this transition that Officer Michael Hart applies brutal force, and propels her face first into a concrete slab–which shatters her face.
Lastly, for ironies sake–I wonder if she knows the history of Skokie Illinois, and the pro-Nazi sentiment that has for nearly half a century lurked in it’s shadows–because as is quite normal with white women, they are oblivious to ‘where they come from’ in regards to race, class, or ethnic oppression–and though the Jewish population of Skokie has diminished in recent years, there is still a strong Jewish community there that might find a certain amount of irony in a woman with the word (or nearly the word) Fuehrer in her name….
BUT HOW CAN AMERICA SLEEP AT NIGHT KNOWING SUCH PREDATORS EXIST–COPS WHO MOST OFTEN FIT THE PROFILE OF SOCIOPATHIC NARCISSISM SO WELL THAT THEIR DEVIANCE ECHOES ONLY THE WORST OF OUR SOCIETY? What kind of man could shatter the face of a 110lb woman??? What would such an officer do WITH A CHILD???????
Would you want one of these people living in your neighborhood? Not if I can help it–although, they do have multiple, and often very obvious stakeouts around my houses at all times.
Whereas once upon a time, American women did not complain when this was being done to American men (police brutality directed at men, the mentally ill, especially men, and others who are perceived as weak is the history of America–males are the preferred targets of police directed stalking, violence and harassment), she is now standing up and suing the law enfarcers of Skokie Illinois for the use excessive force(which means police brutality in plain English).
Watch the video below, and note what happens at 22 seconds, when the cop throws her into a cell–and directs his full force at HER BACK, propelling her into the concrete slab:
Also here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pgr14LXjbVw
Skokie IL has a long history with Nazi’s, and in this case, it looks like the citizens lost–because crypto-Nazi’s have infiltrated every police farce in America.
Now, in America, the police act as agents of eugenics, mind control, and defacto gatekeepers who ensure that some cases never get to trial before their dirty fingers muddy up the records–and the murder of the mentally ill (eugenics), the murder of people who suffer from other medical conditions, and now, the nearly routine beating and harassment of women serves to enforce many things which would be an entirely seperate article–things like the “leveling of the playing field by the reduction of white female privilege,” or ” eugenics and crime control,” or ” the reduction of health care costs by targeting the mentally ill,” are all separate thought-trains; but suffice it to say that Mrs. Feurstein fits one of those a couple of those categories.
What makes this case unique? Nothing, really–the police in America are out of control everywhere you look, or live. But what makes this case unique is that it invokes a special provision of the United States Constitution: the 14th amendment clause that demands that officers of the law are required to protect a victim of police abuse–that other officers who witness police brutality are seldom aware of.
If an officer of the law violates the rights of a citizen–it is the DUTY of any officer who witnesses such infractions to PROTECT the person being abused. I myself have never had such protections–certainly Kelly Thomas, and thousands of others who are brutalized by police EVERY year were not so protected–but in this case, there is a very unique qualifier: there were cameras, and there were cops OTHER THAN THE PRIMARY SOCIOPATH who were very likely AWARE OF THE LAW, or, in the very least possibility that the cameras in the station house were MONITORING THEIR ACTIONS–and they put on a show indeed:
In the case of Feuerstein, other police have an obligation to protect her from further abuse by police, which is likely why we see the ‘kind, compassionate response’ by the officer who is cradling her after the brutality inflicted on her by Hart–this appears later in the video.
My opinion based on the footage, is that it is likely that such a kind gesture as that exhibited by the man who responds to Officer Michael Harts sadistic assault on a 110 lb. woman is in fact a genuine desire by that officer to protect a victim of law enfarcement from more abuse by police colleagues and other sociopaths who masquerade as police–but it is equally likely that it is a CYA maneuver–because modern police have are studying, or have learned the value of acting for the camera ( as I have documented elsewhere in two of my own cases where I was ceremoniously violated, and others, both of which are part of future litigation one way or the other.)”
“Courts have held that police officers in certain circumstances have a duty to intervene to protect individuals from excessive force by other police officers, Rennie v. Davis, 264 F.3d 86 (1st Cir. 2001) (holding the right exists in the context of client in state hospital and strongly implying it exists in police arrest cases)”
So Feuerstein is in fact also potentially a federal case in that it invokes the due process clause of the 14th amendment. And I DOUBT that there is a cop in my state who has read that, even though they have done what they have done for decades. And I was quite aware of my responsibility to myself and others to document those abuses, including squad car cams which I fully expect to have a ‘hard time’ calling up in discovery–which is quite alright with me, because it will show that there is indeed a selective evidence collection procedure under-lying their harassment.
ANd this is the sad and actual fact: what they are doing with their camera manipulation and constitutionally repugnant (and I might add bad actin job) makes us all less than ourselves–because then, we are what THEY SAY WE ARE, when they manipulate the viewers eyes in such ways as this. We become cartoons of ourselves, in our most humiliated and humiliating postures–that posture, one of absolute co-option by the panopticon, and its police state representatives.
Special notes, links, and unfinished rough ideas below the line:
half of people murdered by police every year are mentally ill: http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/half-people-shot-police-are-mentally-ill-investigation-finds
woman calls 911 for help for her diabetic fiancee’, cops arrive and shoot him dead.
cops shoot wheel-chair bound double amputee who was carrying a pen
in the case of Feurstein, other police have an obligation to protect her from further abuse by police, which is likely why we see the ‘kind, compassionate response’ by the officer who is cradling her after the brutality inflicted on her by Hart.
It is as possible that such a kind gesture is in fact a genuine desire by that officer top protect her from more abuse–but equally likely that it is a CYA maneuver–because modern police have learned the value of acting for the camera ( as I have documented elswhere in one of my own cases, and others)”
“Courts have held that police officers incertain circumstances have a duty to intervene to protect individuals from excessive force by other police officers, Rennie v. Davis, 264 F.3d 86 (1st Cir. 2001) (holding the right exists in the contextof client in state hospital and strongly implying it exists in police arrest cases)
So Feurstein is in fact also a fedreal case in thatit invokes the due process clauese of the 14th amendment.
skokie illinois nazi party police
Deep cover Nazi’s
as recently as 1976, the Supreme
Court reaffirmed “that the guarantees of freedom of expression are not an
absolute prohibition under all circumstances ’3 2 and that in some situations,
prior restraints on speech may be justifed, although a great presumption
against the use of prior restraints continues intact. It is of some consequence
that the Court, while speaking of prior restraints in terms of both speech generally, as well as publication, emphasized the special need for an unfettered
press to serve citizens in carrying out the exercise of their governing function
in a democracy.
The concurrence cites Near v. Minnesota”a in which three possible exceptional circumstances justifying prior restraints on speech are delimited. These
three exceptions to the prohibition against prior restraints are: (1) obscene
publications; (2) incitements to acts of violence which threaten the security of
community life; and (3) speech meriting constitutional protection which nevertheless may be suppressed prior to publication in the interest of some
overriding countervailing interest.3 4 Although Justice Brennan notes that the
third category has only been mentioned in passing, he acknowledges that the
first two categories have been interpreted as situations in which the “speech
involved” is not encompassed within the meaning of the First Amendment…
*FINE PRINT FOR PRYING EYES ONLY: most of us here in Freedumbland understabd that words are NT weapons, or bombs, and neither are they intended to incite anything other than thought. And we also know thta tyou, the entitled, cloistered, fraternal/maternal order people are at war with free speech, and the opinions of individuals who are clearly threatened at all times by you and your state sanctioned brutality–your incitement against citizens rights. So when you read this blog, remember that YOU were NOT invited here–and remember that you did not study rhetoric in police brutality school. So, the phrase “I hope somebody shoots this guy in the face” is intended rhetorically, and metaphorically, of course–everywhere that it appears in this blog.
- Cassandra Feuerstein a Victim of Police Brutality in Skokie, Illinois (everyjoe.com)
- Woman Suffers Police Brutality Being Shoved Headfirst Into Cell Bench that Breaks her Facial Bones (elementulhuliganic.wordpress.com)
- Surveillance Video Shows Cop Hurling Woman Face First Into Concrete Cell, Woman Now Suing Skokie, Illinois Police Department (reason.com)
- Suit claims Skokie cop used excessive force on woman accused of DUI (suntimes.com)
- Suit: Woman Suffered Broken Bones At Hands Of Skokie Cop (chicago.cbslocal.com)
- **WARNING GRAPHIC CONTENT** COPS SHATTER 110 Lb WOMAN’s FACE By Throwing Her Into Concrete Bench [VIDEO] (secretsofthefed.com)
- This is what prior restraint looks like (buzzmachine.com)
- Prior Restraint Doctrine Protects Negative Yelp Review Against Preliminary Injunction (pubcit.typepad.com)
- Judge temporarily bans all media from reporting details of 9-year-old girl’s attack at Best Buy (jacksonville.com)
- More State-Sponsored Brutality … Skokie Police Style (youviewed.com)